Well, according to the Board of Mythomania's website - those who wish to apply for appointment for the anticipated vacancy (due to Ms. Shah's election to the Township Council) must forward a letter of intent along with a resume by January 15, 2014. You can check their website for the details.
Now, let's hope they appoint someone who will actually do something about their failure to disclose all those unbudgeted heads they keep adding to the hopper - with Your tax dollars and without Your knowledge!
Monday, December 30, 2013
Friday, December 6, 2013
2013 Graduation Rates in Downtown Edison
Here's the data for Downtown Edison that was extracted from the NJ DOE website for the 2013 graduation rates. Total District was 93.90%; EHS 90.22% and JPS 97.29%. Complete list here.
Friday, November 22, 2013
Edison Board of Mythomania - Failure to Disclose 'Unbudgeted' Heads to Staff!?!
You know, it's one thing to ask my friends over there on Mythomania Lane to disclose to the residents all these 'unbudgeted' heads they've added over the years but quite another to be told they'll take it under consideration or they're working on it - and then do nothing about it.
That's just Not Nice!
Now, no one recognizes the need for fluidity in the hiring process throughout the school year more than me. No problem there. They do what they believe they have to do as reality rolls in. Problem comes in when they don't tell you what they did and hide it in their budgets you vote on every year.
By doing that, you don't get to have a say in the largest expenditure in the school budget or see the true growth of the staffing levels. If you knew they had already added 'unbudgeted' staff but were still asking for more - wouldn't you ask Why? And wouldn't you want some explanation for the 'unbudgeted' staff added?
So, take a look at their numbers on the staff growth in staff since I've been looking at it:
They've increased their staff by some 394 heads and you never ever saw it! That's a 22% increase in staff just from this hideous practice of not disclosing all these 'unbudgeted' heads in their budgets.
Now, I'm being overly generous here. I'm only talking about the net 'unbudgeted' heads against the total staffing in their budgets. If you look at the detail by position, you can see it's all over the place. For example, in the School Year 2012-13, they've added 7 heads ( 1 Reg. Nurse, 3 Guidance Counselors, 1 Secondary Supervisor, 1 Data System Analyst and 1 Lunch Aide). They've deleted 4 heads ( 1 Health Services Supervisor, 2 Occupational Therapists and 1 Principal) - for a net of 3 'unbudgeted' heads.
Here's where you can see it:
So, there's two things you want to take away from the above schedule:
Anyhoo, it's just Not Nice for this Board to continue to treat the residents of Downtown Edison with such disrespect - especially since it's not an unknown practice and it's our money they're playing with.
That's just Not Nice!
Now, no one recognizes the need for fluidity in the hiring process throughout the school year more than me. No problem there. They do what they believe they have to do as reality rolls in. Problem comes in when they don't tell you what they did and hide it in their budgets you vote on every year.
By doing that, you don't get to have a say in the largest expenditure in the school budget or see the true growth of the staffing levels. If you knew they had already added 'unbudgeted' staff but were still asking for more - wouldn't you ask Why? And wouldn't you want some explanation for the 'unbudgeted' staff added?
So, take a look at their numbers on the staff growth in staff since I've been looking at it:
They've increased their staff by some 394 heads and you never ever saw it! That's a 22% increase in staff just from this hideous practice of not disclosing all these 'unbudgeted' heads in their budgets.
Now, I'm being overly generous here. I'm only talking about the net 'unbudgeted' heads against the total staffing in their budgets. If you look at the detail by position, you can see it's all over the place. For example, in the School Year 2012-13, they've added 7 heads ( 1 Reg. Nurse, 3 Guidance Counselors, 1 Secondary Supervisor, 1 Data System Analyst and 1 Lunch Aide). They've deleted 4 heads ( 1 Health Services Supervisor, 2 Occupational Therapists and 1 Principal) - for a net of 3 'unbudgeted' heads.
Here's where you can see it:
So, there's two things you want to take away from the above schedule:
- First, always keep the prior year budget you voted on and use that to compare to the prior year column in next year's budget. That's where you'll be able to see all the 'unbudgeted' heads added.
- Second, don't approve any new School Budgets until they begin to disclose to you what they're doing with Staffing and what they've already done.
Anyhoo, it's just Not Nice for this Board to continue to treat the residents of Downtown Edison with such disrespect - especially since it's not an unknown practice and it's our money they're playing with.
Wednesday, November 20, 2013
Board of Mythomania's - Staffing Shell Game alive & well?!?
You know, as long as the Board of Mythomania fails to report out staffing changes to their budget and continues to hide all those Unbudgeted changes by failing to disclose it in the budgets you're asked to vote on - and You allow them to continue doing it, then this hideous practice will continue:
Can you seriously believe they've added 394.3 unbudgeted people to the staff over the years and they didn't tell you and therefore you didn't get to see it in their budgets or have a say before you voted?? Believe it, it's true - their own numbers show it. They know it but do it anyway.
Here's what it looks like by year:
Now, don't be confused when they report out additions and deletions by name in their monthly agendas - they don't relate any of that to what's in their budget. It's just a hodgepodge of names.
Anyhoo, until You make them report out their staffing changes to budget and get back some control over the Out-of-Control $pending over there on Mythomania Lane, the largest portion of your tax dollars here in Downtown Edison will continue to go into that Bloated Pot of Money they call a School Budget.
But hey, at least we're comforted in the knowledge that the Edison Council looks at it every time a School Budget is defeated - with eyes wide shut!
Gotta like what goes on in Downtown Edison - unchecked!
Can you seriously believe they've added 394.3 unbudgeted people to the staff over the years and they didn't tell you and therefore you didn't get to see it in their budgets or have a say before you voted?? Believe it, it's true - their own numbers show it. They know it but do it anyway.
Here's what it looks like by year:
Now, don't be confused when they report out additions and deletions by name in their monthly agendas - they don't relate any of that to what's in their budget. It's just a hodgepodge of names.
Anyhoo, until You make them report out their staffing changes to budget and get back some control over the Out-of-Control $pending over there on Mythomania Lane, the largest portion of your tax dollars here in Downtown Edison will continue to go into that Bloated Pot of Money they call a School Budget.
But hey, at least we're comforted in the knowledge that the Edison Council looks at it every time a School Budget is defeated - with eyes wide shut!
Gotta like what goes on in Downtown Edison - unchecked!
Understanding How Your Property Tax Bill works in Downtown Edison
Here's something I put together that may or may not help you understand Your Property Tax Bill here in Downtown Edison. If it does, great - if not, feel free to ignore.
If this works, I'll add another one that will help you understand what causes the Property Tax Rate to change year-to-year.
If this works, I'll add another one that will help you understand what causes the Property Tax Rate to change year-to-year.
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Promotions & Lawsuit settlements - oh my!?!
Well, after reading the latest bit of Edison news here, there's only one way to describe the long-running dysfunctional politics here in Downtown Edison
'Under the agreement, the officers and their lawyers will share just over $1 million, the township's labor attorney, Louis Rainone, confirmed. Edison has spent at least $250,000 to fight the various rollback lawsuits, with hundreds of thousands more in legal fees picked up by insurance, Rainone said.'
Joining in the frey is former Councilwomen Melissa Perilstein who chimes in with (referring to Mayor Ricigliano) 'It's business as usual' and 'She had a real opportunity to turn the tide on the unprofessional cycle that has plagued the department. It's a missed opportunity, and it's going to cost the township a fortune.'
With all due respect to Ms. Perilstein, it's hard to take her partisan comments too seriously - she was a staunch supporter on the Council for former Mayor Jun 'RForMe' Choi - and we all know about his tenure as mayor. As with her tenure on the Council - Beware the Perils of Perilstein!
Guess it's true what they say though - we get the the type of government we deserve here in Downtown Edison!
Anyhoo, serious problems require serious people to fix them - too bad there's a dire shortage of them here in Downtown Edison.
JUST PLAIN UGLY
Joining in the frey is former Councilwomen Melissa Perilstein who chimes in with (referring to Mayor Ricigliano) 'It's business as usual' and 'She had a real opportunity to turn the tide on the unprofessional cycle that has plagued the department. It's a missed opportunity, and it's going to cost the township a fortune.'
With all due respect to Ms. Perilstein, it's hard to take her partisan comments too seriously - she was a staunch supporter on the Council for former Mayor Jun 'RForMe' Choi - and we all know about his tenure as mayor. As with her tenure on the Council - Beware the Perils of Perilstein!
Guess it's true what they say though - we get the the type of government we deserve here in Downtown Edison!
Anyhoo, serious problems require serious people to fix them - too bad there's a dire shortage of them here in Downtown Edison.
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
EDO sweeps in Downtown Edison
Congratulations to the victors in yesterday's local election here in Downtown Edison. According to the SL reporting here, the results are as follows:
Mayor:
Lankey 8,021 39%
Ricigliano 5,497 27%
Gaspari 4,213 20%
Prasad 2,956 14%
Soni 47 0%
Council:
Diehl 8,447 15%
Gomez 7,998 14%
Shah 7,842 14%
Resner 5,888 11%
Shukla 5,053 9%
Viruet 4,676 8%
Wan. 3,012 5%
S. Patel. 3,466 6%
Zuckerman 3,479 6%
M. Patel 2,120 4%
Nagel 1,971 4%
Doherty 2,044 4%
Mayor:
Lankey 8,021 39%
Ricigliano 5,497 27%
Gaspari 4,213 20%
Prasad 2,956 14%
Soni 47 0%
Council:
Diehl 8,447 15%
Gomez 7,998 14%
Shah 7,842 14%
Resner 5,888 11%
Shukla 5,053 9%
Viruet 4,676 8%
Wan. 3,012 5%
S. Patel. 3,466 6%
Zuckerman 3,479 6%
M. Patel 2,120 4%
Nagel 1,971 4%
Doherty 2,044 4%
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



