Update - just stopped in at the Council meeting to see what happened with the Suez Ballot question. Long story short, Señor Joshi left his big boy pants at home and Bob 'See No Conflict' Diehl was too busy being offended by the politics at Monday night's meeting and while he said he had no problem putting this on a referendum - he voted No to even put it up for a Council vote. One-Hundred thousand plus residents just got rolled over by 7 Processing Clerks.
Well, what are you going to do Bob with the $851 million Suez Sewer & Water deal now that your running for Freeholder? Gonna go along with Gomez, Sendelsky & Lombardi and not give the People of Edison a chance to Vote on what's gonna happen to us over the next 40 years?
Anyhoo, assuming Señor Joshi is paying attention and puts on his big boy pants, sure looks like it all comes down to You Bob - that is, if a ballot resolution even makes it to a Council vote.
Wednesday, April 10, 2019
Monday, April 8, 2019
Whatcha doin' Tom!?!
Well, while I recognize the old political adage.. 'Never Complain, Never Explain - your friends won't believe you and your enemies will use it against you,' but really now?
What's this all about? This Stinks as Bad as that $851M Sewer & Water deal you're trying to cut the People of Edison out of deciding.
What? Some more 'Public Meetings' and then the 7 Processing Clerks on the Council Vote? And maybe, we can hear Señor Sendelsky pass another (less than appropriate) comment about a Resident at the podium to speak.
Not happy that the committee people chose Brescher and Ship-Freeman in the screening process instead of Lombardi & Sendelsky?
As the highest ranking Democratic Party elected official here in the 'DemBadLands' of Downtown Edison, Messrs. Lombardi and Sendelsky having lost the support of the Local Democratic Party (EDO) in the screening process are now running off the line in the primary and that's okay with you?
Boo..hoo they lost and so some of your support but geez, isn't there some kind of obligation to the EDO to support the candidates that win the endorsement of the EDO - and Not Run Against Them?
Yeah, really solid Democrats here - support the Dem-Party when things go your way and go against it when they don't.
Seems to me that if you join this particularly dysfunctional group and you take the benefits they afford you, then you can really can't and shouldn't complain when they take them away.
Shame on you Messrs. Lombardi and Sendelsky but thanks for showing your true colors to the People of Edison. It should be about the People of Edison and Not You Two.
And Senor Lankey, you really think this is going to help you and also make the EDO Party stronger?
Below, I found the Petitions for the Edison Democrats 2019 from an OPRA Request & Response on Charlie Kratovil's Twitter feed. Here's the ticket;
1. Michael Lombardi
2. Bhavini Tara Shah (EDO Attorney)
3. Leonard Sendelsky
4. Namisha Shukla
Also, saw some activity at the Committee person level as well as the Republican Organization's ticket for the Primary;
Her's the Republican Primary ticket;
1. Russell Azzarello
2. Cathleen Lynch Kilic
3. John J, Roche
4. Gerald T. Shine
(With apologies if I spelled anyone's name incorrectly. Please let me know and I will correct.)
Anyhoo, good example of the how the Democratic Party powers-that be view the Democratic process here in Downtown Edison - only accept it if it's in your favor.
PS: Hear that Bob 'See No Conflict' Diehl is running for Freeholder off the ticket - geez, Bob - thought you would of had higher aspirations than Freeholder. Do you really want to have to deal with Charlie 'I Abstain' Tomaro..aka 'Deputy Dog' again? That's a Tad Bit disappointing and a step-down for you, don't you think?
And finally, is it true one of the original Edison Council Choi-bots, Melissa 'Beware the Perils of Perilstein' Perilstein is running for Middlesex County Sheriff? That's a Tad Bit More disappointing.
What's this all about? This Stinks as Bad as that $851M Sewer & Water deal you're trying to cut the People of Edison out of deciding.
What? Some more 'Public Meetings' and then the 7 Processing Clerks on the Council Vote? And maybe, we can hear Señor Sendelsky pass another (less than appropriate) comment about a Resident at the podium to speak.
Not happy that the committee people chose Brescher and Ship-Freeman in the screening process instead of Lombardi & Sendelsky?
As the highest ranking Democratic Party elected official here in the 'DemBadLands' of Downtown Edison, Messrs. Lombardi and Sendelsky having lost the support of the Local Democratic Party (EDO) in the screening process are now running off the line in the primary and that's okay with you?
Boo..hoo they lost and so some of your support but geez, isn't there some kind of obligation to the EDO to support the candidates that win the endorsement of the EDO - and Not Run Against Them?
Yeah, really solid Democrats here - support the Dem-Party when things go your way and go against it when they don't.
Seems to me that if you join this particularly dysfunctional group and you take the benefits they afford you, then you can really can't and shouldn't complain when they take them away.
Shame on you Messrs. Lombardi and Sendelsky but thanks for showing your true colors to the People of Edison. It should be about the People of Edison and Not You Two.
And Senor Lankey, you really think this is going to help you and also make the EDO Party stronger?
Below, I found the Petitions for the Edison Democrats 2019 from an OPRA Request & Response on Charlie Kratovil's Twitter feed. Here's the ticket;
1. Michael Lombardi
2. Bhavini Tara Shah (EDO Attorney)
3. Leonard Sendelsky
4. Namisha Shukla
Also, saw some activity at the Committee person level as well as the Republican Organization's ticket for the Primary;
Her's the Republican Primary ticket;
1. Russell Azzarello
2. Cathleen Lynch Kilic
3. John J, Roche
4. Gerald T. Shine
(With apologies if I spelled anyone's name incorrectly. Please let me know and I will correct.)
Anyhoo, good example of the how the Democratic Party powers-that be view the Democratic process here in Downtown Edison - only accept it if it's in your favor.
PS: Hear that Bob 'See No Conflict' Diehl is running for Freeholder off the ticket - geez, Bob - thought you would of had higher aspirations than Freeholder. Do you really want to have to deal with Charlie 'I Abstain' Tomaro..aka 'Deputy Dog' again? That's a Tad Bit disappointing and a step-down for you, don't you think?
And finally, is it true one of the original Edison Council Choi-bots, Melissa 'Beware the Perils of Perilstein' Perilstein is running for Middlesex County Sheriff? That's a Tad Bit More disappointing.
Saturday, March 30, 2019
Edison's All Dem-party Rule - they may hold public positions of trust - but you can't always trust them!
Well, trust - guess that's somewhat of a paradox wrapped in an enigma for me here in the 'DemBadlands' of Downtown Edison.
Mayor Tom 'Now 17.1% but Won't Debate' ChoiLankey believes this $851m Suez deal is best for the town. I'm sure he does but can you believe him?
You know, under the Faulkner Act, we're a Strong Mayor, Weak Council form of government. Well, if history is any indication, that's half true - we have a Weak Council. Given how they rolled this bombshell agreement out and a track history of being less than truthful - how could You possibly trust any of them?
I certainly don't and You shouldn't.
Senor Lankey promised to Stabilize taxes when he first ran for Mayor in 2013 and the first thing he did when he got in - Raise the Muni-tax by 8%! What, he didn't know what was going on in town when he was sitting there on the Council for the previous few years and was even Chairman of the Finance Committee.
Since then, he has managed to Raise the Muni-tax up by 17.1%, nearly doubled the Commercial Sewer tax and the Residential Sewer tax by almost half. He even Raised the Garbage tax.
And now, thrown in to the mix is his 7 Processing Clerks who since Lankey's tenure agreed and adopted every single one of his tax increases. So much for Checks & Balances.
So, You want to believe and trust what Señor Lankey and his Band of 7 Processing Clerks are saying about this $851m Suez deal when they kind of have a track history of being somewhat disingenuous with You?
I don't so I sent an email to the Clerk's office which reads as follows;
'With all due respect Council Members, the only Vote the Edison Council should be making on this $851 million (Suez) agreement is to put in on the Ballot in November.'
If the deal is as good as they claim, then let the People of Edison come to that conclusion over the next few months since we're the ones that have to pay for it over the next 40-years. And seriously, is there one single Local Elected Official in office now that will even be effected or affected by switching the Water over to Suez here on the South side of town?
Remember what they told you back then? 'Vote for Tax Stability in Edison' - that didn't work out to well for us over the years, did it?
Anyhoo, this thing shouldn't be about trusting elected officials here in Downtown Edison - you shouldn't. You also shouldn't let them rush through such a significant and long-lasting agreement without Your Say So. This $851m Agreement belongs on the Ballot so the People of Edison can decide for themselves if we want to go down this route for the next 40 years.
Mayor Tom 'Now 17.1% but Won't Debate' ChoiLankey believes this $851m Suez deal is best for the town. I'm sure he does but can you believe him?
You know, under the Faulkner Act, we're a Strong Mayor, Weak Council form of government. Well, if history is any indication, that's half true - we have a Weak Council. Given how they rolled this bombshell agreement out and a track history of being less than truthful - how could You possibly trust any of them?
I certainly don't and You shouldn't.
Senor Lankey promised to Stabilize taxes when he first ran for Mayor in 2013 and the first thing he did when he got in - Raise the Muni-tax by 8%! What, he didn't know what was going on in town when he was sitting there on the Council for the previous few years and was even Chairman of the Finance Committee.
Since then, he has managed to Raise the Muni-tax up by 17.1%, nearly doubled the Commercial Sewer tax and the Residential Sewer tax by almost half. He even Raised the Garbage tax.
And now, thrown in to the mix is his 7 Processing Clerks who since Lankey's tenure agreed and adopted every single one of his tax increases. So much for Checks & Balances.
So, You want to believe and trust what Señor Lankey and his Band of 7 Processing Clerks are saying about this $851m Suez deal when they kind of have a track history of being somewhat disingenuous with You?
I don't so I sent an email to the Clerk's office which reads as follows;
'With all due respect Council Members, the only Vote the Edison Council should be making on this $851 million (Suez) agreement is to put in on the Ballot in November.'
If the deal is as good as they claim, then let the People of Edison come to that conclusion over the next few months since we're the ones that have to pay for it over the next 40-years. And seriously, is there one single Local Elected Official in office now that will even be effected or affected by switching the Water over to Suez here on the South side of town?
Remember what they told you back then? 'Vote for Tax Stability in Edison' - that didn't work out to well for us over the years, did it?
Anyhoo, this thing shouldn't be about trusting elected officials here in Downtown Edison - you shouldn't. You also shouldn't let them rush through such a significant and long-lasting agreement without Your Say So. This $851m Agreement belongs on the Ballot so the People of Edison can decide for themselves if we want to go down this route for the next 40 years.
Friday, March 29, 2019
$851m Suez deal - as much as I may like Señor Lankey - this is too much political maneuvering, even for him!
Well, that was an interesting way to find out the details of Mayor Tom 'Now 17.1% but Won't Debate' ChoiLankey's 2-year double-secret attempt to privatize the sewer and water systems. Walk into a meeting without seeing anything about this deal (other than what they wanted you to see) and be confronted with a document some 800 pages long and a bunch of Lankey's experts sitting there to answer your questions.
Yeah, that kind of seems fair to open it up for questions when no one was able to see and review the details before the meeting and then have to listen to their summary presentation about why is was such a good deal!
Senor Lankey and his Band of 7 Processing Clerks..aka Edison all-Dem Council (who were all in attendance like good little soldiers) should be ashamed of themselves.
And let's not forget those other two Graduates (but still Committeemen) of the EDO who showed up to support Señor Lankey - you remember them; The Poster-Child for Everything that's Wrong with the EDO and The EDO's Greatest Failure.
You should know by now that whenever Charlie 'I Abstain' Tomaro..aka 'Deputy Dog' shows up for one of these events - some Dem-party thingie's going on and it's gonna stink.
And let's not forget our 18th District Assemblyman Rob 'Mr. Temper-a-Ment' Karabinchak was in attendance. Geez, I wonder with his recent success with his Porch-Pirate Bill now heading to the Senate - if he sees any Pirating going on here and wanna Help his constituents in Downtown Edison? Just a thought.
But wait, it gets better. They're gonna have 3 more public meeting on April 3rd and 4th for you to ask questions - all, of course, at convenient times for you - Not.
Why?
Because the Council is tentatively going to introduce the ordinance involving this agreement on April 10th! Really, then what pass it in May 2019? Or is Señor Lankey hoping that two of his cronies on the Council who lost the Local Dem-party screening challenge the Local Dem-party who didn't pick them in June and hope to pass it after the primary?
Who knows and who cares. They've already decided what they're gonna do and they just need the Council's approval so they can go get the necessary state approvals, which according to them should take around 90 days.
And, regardless of the prepared statement from Councilman Joshi and Councilman Coyle's attempt for more time rhetoric to review the documents - don't believe them and don't trust them. Geez, Councilman Joshi - a prepared statement you give out after the meeting? You were at the meeting, why didn't you just go up to the microphone if you had something to say to the People of Edison?
Clearly, in spite of their lack of transparency, a lot of People showed up last night and expressed their displeasure with this whole list of questions and concerns. Concerns were expressed about such things as Suez, privatization, costs, the lack of transparency on this issue, the quality of water and given the size and length of this agreement that it should be put up on the ballot in November and let the People of Edison decide. All good stuff!
Kudos to all the People who took the time to come out and speak about this matter. This deal is too Big and being rushed through too quickly to be anything but a Dem-party sham. And, for that reason alone, it should Not be left in the hands of the Edison Council, regardless of who wins the June Dem primary.
The only Vote the Edison Council should be making on this $851 million agreement is to put in on the Ballot in November.
Kudos to Mr. Don Tarr (Edison District 73 Dem-Committeeman) on his comments last night that kind of sums it all up for you:
Anyhoo, aren't you Happy that we have a one-party rule in this town - where the faith of this town for the next 40-years lies is in the hands of a Bunch of Local Dem-party Groupies looking for their next leg-up in the Local Dem-party pecking order?!?
Yeah, that kind of seems fair to open it up for questions when no one was able to see and review the details before the meeting and then have to listen to their summary presentation about why is was such a good deal!
Senor Lankey and his Band of 7 Processing Clerks..aka Edison all-Dem Council (who were all in attendance like good little soldiers) should be ashamed of themselves.
And let's not forget those other two Graduates (but still Committeemen) of the EDO who showed up to support Señor Lankey - you remember them; The Poster-Child for Everything that's Wrong with the EDO and The EDO's Greatest Failure.
You should know by now that whenever Charlie 'I Abstain' Tomaro..aka 'Deputy Dog' shows up for one of these events - some Dem-party thingie's going on and it's gonna stink.
And let's not forget our 18th District Assemblyman Rob 'Mr. Temper-a-Ment' Karabinchak was in attendance. Geez, I wonder with his recent success with his Porch-Pirate Bill now heading to the Senate - if he sees any Pirating going on here and wanna Help his constituents in Downtown Edison? Just a thought.
But wait, it gets better. They're gonna have 3 more public meeting on April 3rd and 4th for you to ask questions - all, of course, at convenient times for you - Not.
Why?
Because the Council is tentatively going to introduce the ordinance involving this agreement on April 10th! Really, then what pass it in May 2019? Or is Señor Lankey hoping that two of his cronies on the Council who lost the Local Dem-party screening challenge the Local Dem-party who didn't pick them in June and hope to pass it after the primary?
Who knows and who cares. They've already decided what they're gonna do and they just need the Council's approval so they can go get the necessary state approvals, which according to them should take around 90 days.
And, regardless of the prepared statement from Councilman Joshi and Councilman Coyle's attempt for more time rhetoric to review the documents - don't believe them and don't trust them. Geez, Councilman Joshi - a prepared statement you give out after the meeting? You were at the meeting, why didn't you just go up to the microphone if you had something to say to the People of Edison?
Clearly, in spite of their lack of transparency, a lot of People showed up last night and expressed their displeasure with this whole list of questions and concerns. Concerns were expressed about such things as Suez, privatization, costs, the lack of transparency on this issue, the quality of water and given the size and length of this agreement that it should be put up on the ballot in November and let the People of Edison decide. All good stuff!
Kudos to all the People who took the time to come out and speak about this matter. This deal is too Big and being rushed through too quickly to be anything but a Dem-party sham. And, for that reason alone, it should Not be left in the hands of the Edison Council, regardless of who wins the June Dem primary.
The only Vote the Edison Council should be making on this $851 million agreement is to put in on the Ballot in November.
Kudos to Mr. Don Tarr (Edison District 73 Dem-Committeeman) on his comments last night that kind of sums it all up for you:
Anyhoo, aren't you Happy that we have a one-party rule in this town - where the faith of this town for the next 40-years lies is in the hands of a Bunch of Local Dem-party Groupies looking for their next leg-up in the Local Dem-party pecking order?!?
Wednesday, March 27, 2019
Public Meeting $851 million Suez Deal - to Big to Fail and left in the hands of Lankey and his All-Dem Council Cronies!
Well, tomorrow night is the public meeting where the administration will be making their case for this deal. You might want to try and be there since it's impact will be significant and will last a very long time if they approve it.
As I see it, this thing with all the issues in towns across the state this Company brings with it - it's a decision that needs to be made by the People of Edison on a Ballot question and not left to Mayor Lankey and his Band of 7 Processing Clerks.
It's too Big A Deal to leave to a Vote by the Council that has long demonstrated there are no Checks and Balances over Lankey's administration.
To paraphrase that long time Edison Dem-party establishment Councilman Tony Massaro, here's what I see 'In My Minds Eye' when I think about the effectiveness of the Checks and Balances here in the 'DemBadLands' of Downtown Edison:
Be that as it may, let them make their case and then leave it up to the People of Edison with a Ballot question to decide if they want to go down this road.
Here's the public notice:
Mayor Lankey's Letter:
Mayor Lankey's fact Sheet:
Anyhoo, this is the biggest thing that has happened to Edison in a long-time. Try and attend the meeting, it's that important.
As I see it, this thing with all the issues in towns across the state this Company brings with it - it's a decision that needs to be made by the People of Edison on a Ballot question and not left to Mayor Lankey and his Band of 7 Processing Clerks.
It's too Big A Deal to leave to a Vote by the Council that has long demonstrated there are no Checks and Balances over Lankey's administration.
To paraphrase that long time Edison Dem-party establishment Councilman Tony Massaro, here's what I see 'In My Minds Eye' when I think about the effectiveness of the Checks and Balances here in the 'DemBadLands' of Downtown Edison:
Be that as it may, let them make their case and then leave it up to the People of Edison with a Ballot question to decide if they want to go down this road.
Here's the public notice:
Mayor Lankey's Letter:
Mayor Lankey's fact Sheet:
Anyhoo, this is the biggest thing that has happened to Edison in a long-time. Try and attend the meeting, it's that important.
Monday, March 25, 2019
Edison BoE - Long Range Facilities Master Plan Overview Presentation to the Overcrowding Taskforce Committee
Well, was just told this was up on the School District's website. You should take the time, if you can, to read the presentation and get informed s much as you can about what they are planning to do.
As I understand it, they already scheduled the Bond Referendum for September 24, 2019 and I see they're also in the process of hiring a Bond Counsel.
Ok, so they must now have an idea right now (at least on a Macro level) of what they're actually going to do, a timeline and the costs involved since they already scheduled the Bond Referendum date.
Since they are already putting something into action - don't you think they should tell us right now what the preliminary number is for the Bond Referendum? I do. So, let me ask.
Shout out to Board President Mr. Shi - how much we talking about here, you know a rough estimate?
As I see it, it's a nice presentation but it's about everything, anything and all things and not about what will actually be done. You really can't comment one way or the other until they share the work that will actually be done, the timing and cost breakdown of what it is they're actually going to do. That includes the architect''s cost per sq. ft. calculations for both additions and renovations and the financing activity/debt service based upon the amount of state aid we will receive.
So, when will we know how much the Bond Referendum will be? There's not a lot of time between now and September 24, 2019 - Bond Referendum speaking. So, hopefully, it's not on September 23, 2019.
Based upon this presentation alone, their obviously planning this Bond Referendum will come with a Humongous price tag - and the People of Edison deserve enough time to review and digest their actual plans, the timing, the costs involved and other factors so there can be an intelligent and informative conversation and dialogue about this Bond Referendum with all the Voters.
I've been waiting a very long-time for the Board of Mythomania to properly address the Overcrowding in this town. It's disgraceful. But I'm also conscious of how they come up with these Bond Referendums here in Edison and the onus is on them to come up with the best plan possible in the most cost effective way possible to address it - and until I see that (along with the NJ DOE Preliminary & Final Eligible Cost Letters and DOE-130's) and they explain their actions, there's no way I will support what they propose.
Anyhoo, pay attention to this major event happening over there on Mythomania Lane. And don't believe any of their hype until they tell you what they're actually planning to do and why and what it's actually going to cost you.
As I understand it, they already scheduled the Bond Referendum for September 24, 2019 and I see they're also in the process of hiring a Bond Counsel.
Ok, so they must now have an idea right now (at least on a Macro level) of what they're actually going to do, a timeline and the costs involved since they already scheduled the Bond Referendum date.
Since they are already putting something into action - don't you think they should tell us right now what the preliminary number is for the Bond Referendum? I do. So, let me ask.
Shout out to Board President Mr. Shi - how much we talking about here, you know a rough estimate?
As I see it, it's a nice presentation but it's about everything, anything and all things and not about what will actually be done. You really can't comment one way or the other until they share the work that will actually be done, the timing and cost breakdown of what it is they're actually going to do. That includes the architect''s cost per sq. ft. calculations for both additions and renovations and the financing activity/debt service based upon the amount of state aid we will receive.
So, when will we know how much the Bond Referendum will be? There's not a lot of time between now and September 24, 2019 - Bond Referendum speaking. So, hopefully, it's not on September 23, 2019.
Based upon this presentation alone, their obviously planning this Bond Referendum will come with a Humongous price tag - and the People of Edison deserve enough time to review and digest their actual plans, the timing, the costs involved and other factors so there can be an intelligent and informative conversation and dialogue about this Bond Referendum with all the Voters.
I've been waiting a very long-time for the Board of Mythomania to properly address the Overcrowding in this town. It's disgraceful. But I'm also conscious of how they come up with these Bond Referendums here in Edison and the onus is on them to come up with the best plan possible in the most cost effective way possible to address it - and until I see that (along with the NJ DOE Preliminary & Final Eligible Cost Letters and DOE-130's) and they explain their actions, there's no way I will support what they propose.
Anyhoo, pay attention to this major event happening over there on Mythomania Lane. And don't believe any of their hype until they tell you what they're actually planning to do and why and what it's actually going to cost you.
Sunday, March 24, 2019
Board of Mythomania's $262.8 million 'Bloated Pot of Money' they call a 2019-20 School Budget - funding their Increased $pending with Taxpayer Relief Money and, of course, another tax increase!
Well, first the Bad News - looks like Jerry 'Needs to Step-down' Shi and his Band of Taxpayer Relief Money Marauders are proposing yet another in a long-line of Out-of-Control $pending School Budgets.
This Preliminary School Budget is $$262.8 million, which is up $12.1 million or 4.8% over last year's $250.7 million. It takes the school tax rate up to $3.112 (Per $100), which is 6.8-cents or 2.2% over last year's $3.044 (Per $100). And, if you noticed, they actually charged us $3.045 for the school tax on last year's tax bills.
That $12.1 million $pending increase includes such thingies as Instruction $4.2 million, Transportation $3.4 million, School Administration $1.3 million - but where these increases sit now really doesn't matter as you'll read down below about their ability to move money around.
That 2.2% increase in the school tax rate is net of an increase of $6.4 million in $pending or 2.95% and an increase in the Ratables of $50,521,717 or 0.72%.
So, if you live in that imaginary home assessed at $178,300 - you'll see your school tax bill go up by another $121.00. If you don't live in that imaginary home assessed at $178,300, then simply take your home's assessed value divided by 100 and multiply that number by $.068 and you'll get your school tax increase (or simply enter your assessed value in the calculator down below).
Now, when you look at this budget, you should recognize that's it's really not a true budget where they publicly measure and report their performance against what they said they were going to do and what they used to set the school tax rate.
It's just a 'Big Fat, Bloated Pot of Money' where they can move money around different accounts pretty much at will.
1. It's a document they use simply to generate an annual school tax rate and share with the public. In the words of former Super Dr. Richard "Looking for the Exit Ramp" O'Malley when school budgets were up for public vote - it's a number (Local School Tax Levy) you're voting on (Not a School Budget).
2. It's a document that's prepared on a fiscal year basis (July 1 - June 30) and then converted to a calendar year basis to generate a calendar year school tax rate, which nobody takes the time to explain.
3. It's a document that never shows the actual performance against it - yet it's used to set the school tax rate every year.
4. It's a document that substitutes the prior year budget numbers in the current year budget using the actual numbers as of February 1, 2019 - not the actual budgeted prior year budget numbers. The theory is you get a better comparison for the current year's budgeted numbers. Maybe so, but of course, that theory also leaves a gaping hole in what doesn't get shown and can be hidden (without disclosure) between July 1 and February 1 - hence, the 'Staffing Shell Game.'
You can easily see this if you pull up the Staffing Summary (page 32) and compare the 2018-19 column (in the current 2019-20 school budget) to the 2018-19 column from a copy of last year's 2018-19 school budget. If you do that, you'll see that in this year's school budget - they're asking for an increase of 32 heads from 2,063.5 to 2,095.5. But wait, if you look at last year's school budget, the 2018-19 column had total heads of 2,059.5 not 2,063.5.
Welcome to the Board of Mythomania's 'Staffing Shell Game' where they hire non-budgeted personal during the current school year and fail to report and disclose it to you in these school budgets. What, you say - it's only a net of 4 heads. When you look at the detail, you find they added 8 non-budgeted assistant principals, 6 non-budgeted teachers, 2 non-budgeted Certified & Registered Nurses, a Security Director and so on - offset by some reductions in staffing to some Para's, Drivers and Secretaries.
Not for nothing but you just gotta ask yourself - where did all that money come from to pay for all these non-budgeted heads?
Don't think this stuff is important or the numbers aren't big enough, then go back and read some prior posts on this and see how many non-budgeted personnel were brought on over the years without disclosure in these school budgets, while asking yourself where did all that money come from if it wasn't budgeted.
5. It's a document that shows how they actually Hoard Taxpayer Relief Money that was Meant to Reduce the School Tax Burden but kept instead and shows some numbers that simply aren't accurate or are at best misleading.
You can easily see this if you look at the 'Other Anticipated Revenue' (page 33) in the 2019-20 School Budget. See the column that says Revised Budget 2018-19? Well, that represents all the money that came in AFTER the 2018-19 school tax rate was set. That's $4,794,479 in Hoarded money. If you look up at the State-aid numbers, you'll see the additional $3.5 million in State-aid they got last year and didn't use to Reduce the School Tax Rate but Kept!
The actual increase for the 2019-20 school year in 'Other Anticipated Revenue on this page is only $4,345,041.
Well, if $4,345,041 is the increase we expect for the 2019-20 school year, then why does the Summary page (page 2) show 'Other Anticipated Revenue' increasing by $9,139,520? We're not getting an increase in the 2019-20 school year of $9,139,520.
Because the Hoarders that be are using all that Hoarded Tax Relief Money to fund the Increased $pending. They took that $4,794,479 (above) and $1,366,621 from the $4,345,041 they anticipate receiving in the 2019-20 school budget and used it to fund the increased $pending in this year's school budget.
That's $6,161,100 in funds meant to Reduce the School Tax Rate and used to fund their 'Out-of-Control $pending Increases. The purpose of State-aid is to help Reduce the Tax Burden - Not to be used to Increase $pending in a subsequent year.
Nice, isn't it?
If you cut that $4,794,479 out of the $pending increase in this school budget and they should, the school tax increase in this budget would drop in half. Time to Stop increasing the Bloat and Fat in these budgets that grow exponentially by the 2% cap every year. Make them do their job and eliminate all the unnecessary $pending over there or just cut the $4.7 million and let them eat off the all the Bloat they have stored up over the years.
Here's how you can see it if you like pics instead of words:
6. It's a document, to paraphrase Rodney Dangerfield, that 'Really tells it like it ain't.'
Next, the Worse News - those on the Board who vote to continue this unnecessary attack on the pocketbooks' of the residents and taxpayers of Edison and not recognize and cut out the obvious excess $pending in this budget will be many for sure - and you should remember who they are the next time you go the polls.
Finally, the Worst News! A Board that fails to recognize and see how Bad these School Budgets really are (and how Badly the resident/taxpayers stakeholders are being treated) or continue to look at these school budgets with eyes wide shut - will be the same Board that will soon put forth a Humongous Bond Referendum with the same eyes wide shut.
And that should Really..Really Scare You!
Here's where you can find out what this school budget will cost you. Enter your home's assessed value and find out what this 2019-20 School Budget will do to the School Tax portion of your Property Tax Bill:
And here's the Board of Mythomania's Preliminary 2019-20 School Budget for you to see and review:
Not sure anyone would disagree that we all want to give our Kids the best education possible - but that also has to be the best possible education within our means. That requires Oversight by the Board that assures us that every dollar we spend is spent wisely and efficiently and a Board that doesn't think of the residents/taxpayers as just a necessary annoyance to be used as a bottomless cash pit, when needed to fund their ineffectiveness.
Anyhoo, since you don't get to vote anymore on these annual 'Bloated, Pot of Money attacks on your pocketbook, then you just might want to make sure you get Board Members on there who will actually do something about what goes on over there on Mythomania Lane and deal with the inefficient, unnecessary and Out-of-Control $pending - year after year, after year, after year...
This Preliminary School Budget is $$262.8 million, which is up $12.1 million or 4.8% over last year's $250.7 million. It takes the school tax rate up to $3.112 (Per $100), which is 6.8-cents or 2.2% over last year's $3.044 (Per $100). And, if you noticed, they actually charged us $3.045 for the school tax on last year's tax bills.
That $12.1 million $pending increase includes such thingies as Instruction $4.2 million, Transportation $3.4 million, School Administration $1.3 million - but where these increases sit now really doesn't matter as you'll read down below about their ability to move money around.
That 2.2% increase in the school tax rate is net of an increase of $6.4 million in $pending or 2.95% and an increase in the Ratables of $50,521,717 or 0.72%.
So, if you live in that imaginary home assessed at $178,300 - you'll see your school tax bill go up by another $121.00. If you don't live in that imaginary home assessed at $178,300, then simply take your home's assessed value divided by 100 and multiply that number by $.068 and you'll get your school tax increase (or simply enter your assessed value in the calculator down below).
Now, when you look at this budget, you should recognize that's it's really not a true budget where they publicly measure and report their performance against what they said they were going to do and what they used to set the school tax rate.
It's just a 'Big Fat, Bloated Pot of Money' where they can move money around different accounts pretty much at will.
1. It's a document they use simply to generate an annual school tax rate and share with the public. In the words of former Super Dr. Richard "Looking for the Exit Ramp" O'Malley when school budgets were up for public vote - it's a number (Local School Tax Levy) you're voting on (Not a School Budget).
2. It's a document that's prepared on a fiscal year basis (July 1 - June 30) and then converted to a calendar year basis to generate a calendar year school tax rate, which nobody takes the time to explain.
3. It's a document that never shows the actual performance against it - yet it's used to set the school tax rate every year.
4. It's a document that substitutes the prior year budget numbers in the current year budget using the actual numbers as of February 1, 2019 - not the actual budgeted prior year budget numbers. The theory is you get a better comparison for the current year's budgeted numbers. Maybe so, but of course, that theory also leaves a gaping hole in what doesn't get shown and can be hidden (without disclosure) between July 1 and February 1 - hence, the 'Staffing Shell Game.'
You can easily see this if you pull up the Staffing Summary (page 32) and compare the 2018-19 column (in the current 2019-20 school budget) to the 2018-19 column from a copy of last year's 2018-19 school budget. If you do that, you'll see that in this year's school budget - they're asking for an increase of 32 heads from 2,063.5 to 2,095.5. But wait, if you look at last year's school budget, the 2018-19 column had total heads of 2,059.5 not 2,063.5.
Welcome to the Board of Mythomania's 'Staffing Shell Game' where they hire non-budgeted personal during the current school year and fail to report and disclose it to you in these school budgets. What, you say - it's only a net of 4 heads. When you look at the detail, you find they added 8 non-budgeted assistant principals, 6 non-budgeted teachers, 2 non-budgeted Certified & Registered Nurses, a Security Director and so on - offset by some reductions in staffing to some Para's, Drivers and Secretaries.
Not for nothing but you just gotta ask yourself - where did all that money come from to pay for all these non-budgeted heads?
Don't think this stuff is important or the numbers aren't big enough, then go back and read some prior posts on this and see how many non-budgeted personnel were brought on over the years without disclosure in these school budgets, while asking yourself where did all that money come from if it wasn't budgeted.
5. It's a document that shows how they actually Hoard Taxpayer Relief Money that was Meant to Reduce the School Tax Burden but kept instead and shows some numbers that simply aren't accurate or are at best misleading.
You can easily see this if you look at the 'Other Anticipated Revenue' (page 33) in the 2019-20 School Budget. See the column that says Revised Budget 2018-19? Well, that represents all the money that came in AFTER the 2018-19 school tax rate was set. That's $4,794,479 in Hoarded money. If you look up at the State-aid numbers, you'll see the additional $3.5 million in State-aid they got last year and didn't use to Reduce the School Tax Rate but Kept!
The actual increase for the 2019-20 school year in 'Other Anticipated Revenue on this page is only $4,345,041.
Well, if $4,345,041 is the increase we expect for the 2019-20 school year, then why does the Summary page (page 2) show 'Other Anticipated Revenue' increasing by $9,139,520? We're not getting an increase in the 2019-20 school year of $9,139,520.
Because the Hoarders that be are using all that Hoarded Tax Relief Money to fund the Increased $pending. They took that $4,794,479 (above) and $1,366,621 from the $4,345,041 they anticipate receiving in the 2019-20 school budget and used it to fund the increased $pending in this year's school budget.
That's $6,161,100 in funds meant to Reduce the School Tax Rate and used to fund their 'Out-of-Control $pending Increases. The purpose of State-aid is to help Reduce the Tax Burden - Not to be used to Increase $pending in a subsequent year.
Nice, isn't it?
If you cut that $4,794,479 out of the $pending increase in this school budget and they should, the school tax increase in this budget would drop in half. Time to Stop increasing the Bloat and Fat in these budgets that grow exponentially by the 2% cap every year. Make them do their job and eliminate all the unnecessary $pending over there or just cut the $4.7 million and let them eat off the all the Bloat they have stored up over the years.
Here's how you can see it if you like pics instead of words:
6. It's a document, to paraphrase Rodney Dangerfield, that 'Really tells it like it ain't.'
Next, the Worse News - those on the Board who vote to continue this unnecessary attack on the pocketbooks' of the residents and taxpayers of Edison and not recognize and cut out the obvious excess $pending in this budget will be many for sure - and you should remember who they are the next time you go the polls.
Finally, the Worst News! A Board that fails to recognize and see how Bad these School Budgets really are (and how Badly the resident/taxpayers stakeholders are being treated) or continue to look at these school budgets with eyes wide shut - will be the same Board that will soon put forth a Humongous Bond Referendum with the same eyes wide shut.
And that should Really..Really Scare You!
Here's where you can find out what this school budget will cost you. Enter your home's assessed value and find out what this 2019-20 School Budget will do to the School Tax portion of your Property Tax Bill:
And here's the Board of Mythomania's Preliminary 2019-20 School Budget for you to see and review:
Not sure anyone would disagree that we all want to give our Kids the best education possible - but that also has to be the best possible education within our means. That requires Oversight by the Board that assures us that every dollar we spend is spent wisely and efficiently and a Board that doesn't think of the residents/taxpayers as just a necessary annoyance to be used as a bottomless cash pit, when needed to fund their ineffectiveness.
Anyhoo, since you don't get to vote anymore on these annual 'Bloated, Pot of Money attacks on your pocketbook, then you just might want to make sure you get Board Members on there who will actually do something about what goes on over there on Mythomania Lane and deal with the inefficient, unnecessary and Out-of-Control $pending - year after year, after year, after year...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)




